Goldman Scapegoat

Far be it from me to defend Goldman Sachs and it’s tone-deaf CEO Lloyd ‘we’re doing God’s work’ Blankfein.

I wonder, though, why Goldman is repeatedly the target of the most vitriolic attacks — including the now famous description of the the firm as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money,” by <em>Rolling Stone</em> writer Matt Taibbi.  http://bit.ly/1nmt8A

They’re also now the target of the largest SEC action of the financial crisis http://bit.ly/ch0zK1.  Which is amazing, when you think about it.  Goldman, which didn’t even want bailout money, has paid the government back, with interest for the funds it was forced to receive by Bush and Paulson.  This is a bigger action than has been taken against Lehman, Bear Stearns, AIG, Citi, B of A …

Are we really to believe that Goldman is the worst offender?  Or are they a convenient scapegoat?  Politically, nothing could be a safer bet than attacking Goldman.

I also wonder if something more insidious could be at work here.  Is it possible that attacking Goldman Sachs, in the press and in the political arena, is more palatable because there is an unconscious undercurrent of anti-semitism?

Founded by a German Jewish Immigrant Marcus Goldman, brought to greatness by Jewish-American Sidney Weinberg, it has long been known as the one white-shoe Wall Street firm that welcomes Jews … which less than a generation ago was a big big deal, since the other firms would only hire Ivy league WASPS.

I’m not suggesting that journos like Taibbi, or prosecutors at the SEC are anti-semitic.  But I do think that there is an atmosphere that can develop around an institution that makes it an easier target.

Is this just another version of scapegoating the “Jewish banker?”

1 Comment

Filed under business, financial crisis, journalism, media business, Politics

Take My Money … Please UPDATE 2

A while back I wrote about the necessity for media / content companies to charge for their online products.  You can find the original post here: http://thebrokentail.com/2009/08/11/take-my-money-please/

Well, the New York Times is finally, belatedly, coming to their senses.  Take a look:

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/new_york_times_set_to_mimic_ws.html

Now, I still think that the Times has a lot of work to do to make this work.  I think they are a bloated institution and have an outmoded editorial strategy.  However, this is a step in a more realistic direction.

Leave a Comment

Filed under content delivery, copyright, journalism, media business, media business

Forget Haiti … Pity Our Poor Bankers

Damn the mettling moralizers.  Daring to question our nation’s banks during their holy season, aka bonus season.  Giving our faithful financiers nothing but grief.

Shame!  Don’t all of you critics realize that they are ‘doing God’s work?’  (Gospel of Lloyd 1:1)

Want proof?  Just look at the generous outpouring of cash to help Haiti in its hour of need.  Goldman:  $1 million.  JP:  $1 million.  Morgan Stanley: $1 million.  BOA: $1 million.

When the chips are down, the banks step up.  I mean, $1 million is .006% of Goldman’s bonus pool!  It’s .0037% of JP Morgan Chase’s bonus pool of $26,900,000,000!!  I mean, like, wow!  That’s a lot!  If taken out of the bonus pool (which it surely won’t be thank God — (by ‘God’ I mean Lloyd and Jamie), your typical employee might have to forgo, what, a couple of thousand bucks out of a $1 million bonus!  The Goldman give is the equivalent of a guy making $50k giving $2.99 (well, sort of … it actually works out to a lot less than that when you consider that $1 means very different things, depending on what you make … but whatever).  What generosity!  (Morgan and BOA’s Q4 earnings aren’t out so we don’t know what their bonuses will be yet)

Those killjoys over at the Service Employees Union pointed out that you could give every man, woman and child in Haiti $9,000 with JPMorgan’s bonus money.  But what good would that do?  I mean, $9,000 only would last a week, tops.  $9,000 barely covers dinners and blow!  Sure, things might be cheaper down there … but come on!

People just don’t get it.  These banks have returned all the money the government loaned them, haven’t they?  Shouldn’t that be enough?  Sure unemployment is at 10%.  Sure a new small business has a snowball’s chance in hell of getting a loan.  Sure, foreclosures were at a record high last year (2.8 million) and will probably rise in 2010.  Sure all this has a lot to do with the financial crisis that the aforementioned banks got us into.  Sure, a whole Presidency has been hobbled (politically and fiscally) by having to try and triage the damage.

But our bankers, they’re ‘doing Gods work.’  The least we can do is thank them.  Now Obama wants to tax the banks with his so-called “Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee.”  Is he crazy?  It will hobble the banks!  It will hobble the whole financial industry!  Plus, like Jamie Dimond of JP Morgan Chase implied when he said “All businesses tend to pass their costs onto customers” … the tax ain’t coming out of their hide!  You think your credit card rates are high now???  Just you wait.

2 Comments

Filed under charity, Politics

Lessons from NBC’s Train Wreck (and the Other O’Brien Who Works in the TV Business)

Watching NBC implode must be great fun to Jeff Immelt and his colleagues at GE.  Probably not so much fun for Brian Roberts and Comcast.  I know the deal was about long-term strategy for both companies, but I’m sure a small ancillary benefit for Immelt and Co. was the satisfaction that, as they looked up from signing the contracts with Comcast, they saw the inevitable train wreck about to occur at NBC primetime (the train was powered by a GE engine … but that’s someone else’s problem now)!

But to misquote Shakespeare, I come to praise NBC, not bury them.  Now, I will not defend the majority of NBC’s actions.  The mismanagement of Jay Leno and Conan O’Brien (no relation, which should be obvious by his height and, some might say, talent) is of Olympian proportions.  Come to think of it, it makes NBC’s expected $100+ million loss on the Winter Olympics look like a molehill.  They’ve alienated Conan to such an extent that he has announced he will not move to 12:05, but would rather leave his network home, where he’s been for 17 years.

I’d argue that Conan should have left as soon as NBC announced that, desperate to keep Jay away from ABC or Fox, they were giving him the 10pm slot.  This alone made Conan’s success almost impossible.  Jay would always get first crack at the best guests … first crack at the days events to riff on in his monologue … and Jay would take his loyal viewers with him.  When Johnny Carson retired, a sizable number of his loyal viewers watched Jay — they had no choice.  Sure, they could watch Letterman … but that’s not the same … it’s not the Tonight Show!   Many became loyal Jay fans.  In fact, Carson basically disappeared when he retired, making sure that he didn’t rain on Jay’s parade.    With the Jay-Conan transition, Conan had no such help … Jay’s loyal fans just watched him at 10.

Then there’s the abysmal performance of Jay at 10.  That was predictable to everyone, except, perhaps, to NBC’s programmers.

But give credit where’s credit is due.   Jeff Zucker and Co. did one big thing right — they acknowledged, and acted to deal with, the fact that doing 5 nights of hour-long dramas in primetime on a broadcast network is no longer financially tenable.  The math just doesn’t add up.  Faced with this reality and others, the reaction of most network executives is to ‘manage decline’ and hold on as long as possible.  At least NBC took a shot, even if they executed poorly (to put it kindly).

Lots of old media companies will draw exactly the wrong lessons from this debacle.  They’ll be convinced that radically re-imagining their business plan based on current realities carries undue risk.  They will say “See what happened to NBC when they tried to do it differently?”  It’s the same thing people say when discussing Katie Couric at CBS.  In the early days of her tenure, she and producer Rome Hartman began experimenting with re-formatting The Evening News.  They failed, and critics had a field day, saying that Katie was trying to turn the show into Today at night.  She wasn’t … and while you can argue with the how … they should be lauded at least trying.  They tried to breathe new life into a dying institution.  Tried to bring in viewers that have been inaccessible to them.

Another example that people use is TimesSelect.  “You can never charge online for content … didn’t you see what happened to The New York Times with Times Select?”  But the fact is, the Times executed a poor plan poorly, probably at the wrong time.  That doesn’t mean that the Times should just continue on indefinitely with the status-quo.  Because it will bankrupt them if they do (unless Carlos Slim takes full control of the paper and bankrolls it as a vanity project).

It’s hard to guess where Conan will go next.  Perhaps he can go to Comedy Central, airing after the Daily Show and Colbert.  It would certainly free him creatively, and give him, finally, strong lead-ins from shows with similar demos.  Perhaps NBC’s new masters at Comcast will let him out of his contract for such a move — it’s not a direct competitor like ABC or Fox, and their main business is cable, after all, where the Comedy Central airs.  Viacom probably couldn’t afford Conan’s current rates … but it’s no longer about the money.  Conan is now faced with rehabilitating a career that has been badly damaged through no fault of his own — rather, it’s been damaged by the network he made hundreds of millions of dollars for.

One other interesting note.  Conan’s press release today (http://bit.ly/5YBDmp) named two late-night personalities by name — David Letterman, the man he revered for so many years (also a man who, foreshadowing his own fate, was mistreated by NBC) and Jimmy Fallon.  He didn’t mention Jay by name, only referring to ‘The Jay Leno Show.’  I think it must be particularly galling for Conan to be supplanted by a man who, I suspect, he thinks is a hack.

Leave a Comment

Filed under content delivery, journalism, media business, media business

Just Like Heaven

December 30

As I put her to bed tonight, my daughter wanted to talk about death and dying.  Not in a macabre way; in a matter-of-fact tone, she asked about what happens when we die, and what heaven is like.  Needless to say, it wasn’t me who planted the concept of death or heaven in her budding consciousness.  I avoid all conversations about death because, well, it fills me with existential dread and seizes me with terror.  As for ‘heaven,’ well, aside from the death fear, I’m too ambivalent spiritually to be of much help there.  So I figure I’ll stay out of it and hope for the best.  Sounds like a good plan, huh?

But Cynthia really wanted to talk about dying and heaven — I didn’t have much choice but to oblige.  Someday, she’ll know how clueless I felt.  In the meantime, I guess I’m all she’s got.  Hopefully, I didn’t screw her up too badly.  Here is an account of our conversation, one of the most entertaining and challenging I’ve had in a long, long time …

INT CC’S BEDROOM, NIGHTTIME

[Just a wedge of light seeps in from the hall.  The house is quiet, the father, lying next to the child in bed, is tired.  But the child's eyes are still wide with curiosity, alive with images half formed, concepts just barely, slowly coming into view]

Daddy, when we die, how do we get to heaven.

Uh, well, angels [almost as if I'm asking, hoping she agrees]…  they watch over us.  [more confidently now] when it’s time, take us there.

Are they like fairies?

Yes, they are.  But honey, you’re not going to– [she interrupts]

Are they real or are they just ‘characters.’

They are real, but you can’t see them.

How are they real if you can’t see them?

Well, it is like love … you know how Mommy and Daddy love you, and you love us…. [she interrupts ... she's wondering why I'm off-topic].

Are they nice or mean?

They are really, really nice.  They love us and look over us and keep us safe.

What happens, to like, us? [she touches her arms and chest]

Our bodies stay here, but our souls [unintelligible parenthetical here on what a soul is] continue on.

How can we fly there if we can’t fly.

Angels have wings,  and they help us.

If we die all at the same time, are there lots of angels to take us, or just a couple who take one at a time?

[confidently] Many.

How do we walk in heaven?

[less confidently]  I’m not sure exactly how it works, but it is a beautiful place with all the people you love and who love you.  But you don’t have to worry about this, because none of us are going to die anytime soon … [she interrupts, she's moved on].

Is there a house to live in in heaven?

Yes, with all of the people you love, and who love you.

Do the angels know who we’re supposed to be with?

Yes, they know.

I want to be with Eliza [cousin] and Brendan [brother].  He’ll be older then and won’t wake up in the middle of the night, or wake up really early in the morning, because he will be older then.  What if Eliza gets there before me because she’s older… who will take care of her?

She will be safe with people who love her.

What if you and mommy die, who will take care of Brendan and me in this house?

Mommy and I aren’t going to die.  You will be living with us for a long, long time, until you get much older and get a house of your own, and Brendan gets a house of his own, and maybe you have kids of your own … that’s a long, long way off.

But Daddy [she rolls towards me and takes my hand] I want to live with you and mommy forever in this house [my heart melts].

Well, you can live with us as long as you want.

Will I have my bed in Heaven?

Yes, if you want it there.

I want to be in this bed forever.  Where is heaven?  Is it in Denver, or Mew York (sic) or farther away?

No, it is far, far away.  Even farther than New York, or even London [her favorite city to which she's never been].  But you know, none of us are going to die anytime soon.  It will be a long, long, long time before you have to worry about any of this.

“Yes, Daddy,  I recognize what you are saying.”

With this, I said goodnight.  She called me back to the door to go over a few key points.  I said goodnight again.

As I walked downstairs, head spinning, she called out one last time.  “Daddy, how will the fairies know that I want my bed in Heaven?”

They’ll know, honey, because you’ll think it, and they know you really well and love you, just like I do.  They’d know, just like I’d know.  I love you.

Love you, too.

Good night.

Good night.

4 Comments

Filed under family, Religion

Separated At Birth

In honor of the huffpost’s separated at birth feature today http://bit.ly/2szJJl,  i present to you Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), and Deputy Droopy Dog (I-Looney Toons). When you hear them speak back to back, it is downright spooky.

1 Comment

Filed under Politics, Separated at Birth

Same Story, Two Headlines … or Why I Read Fox First This Morning

Two headlines caught my eye this morning on my iGoogle page:

New York Times:

“Fort Hood Gunman Gave Signals Before Rampage”

Fox News:

“Alleged Fort Hood Shooter Frequented Local Strip Club”

Same story, different takes… I read Fox first, needless to say!

Leave a Comment

Filed under journalism, media business